Skip to the content

Guide

Selling a fragrance in Great Britain

Great Britain kept the architecture of EU cosmetics law and then stopped following it. Four years on, the two regimes disagree about who may hold your file, which portal to notify, and how many allergens go on the carton.

Checked against the sources named at the foot of this page on 12 August 2026.

First, decide which UK you mean

Great Britain means England, Scotland and Wales. Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom but stays aligned with EU cosmetics rules under the Windsor Framework, so a product sold in Belfast follows the EU list and is notified to the EU portal, while the same product sold in Cardiff does not and is not.

The United Kingdom is two regimes for this purpose

Great Britain

England, Scotland, Wales

Retained law, amended since. UK responsible person, SCPN, the shorter allergen list.

Northern Ireland

Aligned with the EU

Under the Windsor Framework. EU responsible person, CPNP, the expanded allergen list.

The same product sold in Belfast and in Cardiff follows two different sets of rules. When a document says UK, find out which of the two it means before acting on it.

This matters more than a constitutional footnote should, because a great deal of guidance written by well-meaning people says UK when it means GB. When you read a rule about the United Kingdom, find out which of the two it covers before you act on it.

The rest of this page is about Great Britain. The underlying structure is the same as the European Union's, because GB copied EU law across at the end of the transition period and has amended it since. Read the EU guide for how the machine works; this page is the list of places the two have come apart.

One perfume, sold into both markets

Your formula, made once

splits in two before it can be sold

European Union

Responsible person in the EU or EEA
Notified to CPNP
The expanded allergen list

Great Britain

Responsible person in the UK
Notified to SCPN
The shorter pre-2023 list

Two responsible persons at two addresses means two label versions, because the address is printed on the label. Northern Ireland follows the EU column.

You need a second responsible person

A GB responsible person must be established in the United Kingdom. An EU or EEA entity cannot serve as one, and a UK entity cannot serve as an EU responsible person either. The relationship is symmetric and there is no workaround.

A business selling the same perfume into both markets therefore needs two responsible persons, at two addresses, which means two label versions, because the address is printed on the label. That is a structural cost of selling into both, and it is the item most often left out of a first plan.

A separate notification, to a separate portal

GB products are notified through the Submit Cosmetic Product Notification service, run by the Office for Product Safety and Standards, rather than through the EU portal. The fields will look familiar because the service was built from the same specification, but it is a separate submission: notifying the EU does nothing for GB, and a product already on sale in France still has to be notified before it goes on sale in Wales.

The product file obligation is the same in substance. A GB responsible person holds the file, at the address on the label, and produces it on request for the same ten-year period. The safety assessment is required in the same way, and the qualification an assessor must hold is written the same way, so an assessment prepared for the EU market is usually usable, with the market-specific parts revisited.

The allergen list is where the two regimes really part

This is the largest practical divergence and the one that shows up on the carton. The European Union rewrote and lengthened its declarable fragrance allergen list, with the first obligation biting on 31 July 2026. Great Britain did not adopt that change and retains the shorter pre-2023 list.

The thresholds themselves did not diverge. GB kept the same mechanism, so an allergen is declared above 0.001 percent of a leave-on product and 0.01 percent of a rinse-off one, exactly as in the EU, and both figures are still percentages of the finished product rather than of the concentrate. What changed is the list those thresholds are applied to.

The consequence is that one label cannot be assumed to serve both markets. A GB label is short of what the EU now requires. An EU label names materials GB does not ask for, which is not itself a GB breach, so a single label carrying the longer list is a legitimate strategy. It is a decision to take deliberately, checking the GB rules on language and legibility against the longer ingredient list, and knowing that the two regimes may move again.

One label, or two

One label, carrying the longer list

Legitimate in both

Declaring more than GB asks for is not a GB breach. One print run, one artwork. The list is longer and the type is smaller, so check it against the GB rules on legibility.

Two labels, one per market

Each exactly right

Shorter GB carton, and each one names its own responsible person. Two print runs, two artworks, and stock that has to be kept apart in the warehouse.

The responsible person settles it either way: the two addresses differ, and the address is printed on the label, so a single artwork still has to carry both. Decide it deliberately rather than arrive at it.

The direction of travel is worth watching rather than betting on. GB has been expected to consult on aligning with the expanded list, and industry advice has generally been to hold the wider data even for GB-only sales, on the reasoning that gathering allergen figures late is far more expensive than gathering them early.

Classification: a different list with the same shape

If you supply concentrate to another business rather than finished perfume to a person, you are classifying and labeling a chemical mixture, and here too GB has its own list. The GB Mandatory Classification List, published by the Health and Safety Executive, does the job the EU's harmonized Annex VI does. It began as a copy and has not tracked EU updates since, so entries can differ.

The same is true of the substances of very high concern list, which is administered separately in GB and is much shorter than the EU's. And GB did not adopt the four new EU hazard classes for endocrine disruptors and for persistent, bioaccumulative, mobile or toxic substances, so a mixture can require a classification in the EU that GB has no equivalent of.

Safety data sheets, and the UFI that is not there

A finished cosmetic supplied to a consumer needs no safety data sheet in GB, for the same reason it needs none in the EU. A mixture supplied to another business does.

GB did not adopt the EU's 2020 update to the safety data sheet format. Sixteen sections are still required and their content is substantively the same, so in practice a current EU sheet is close to a GB sheet. The visible difference is the unique formula identifier: the EU requires one on the label and in section 1 of the sheet, tied to a poison center notification. GB did not adopt that system and has no equivalent, so a GB sheet does not carry a UFI.

The differences in one table

Where the two regimes disagree, as of August 2026.
Obligation European Union Great Britain
Responsible personEstablished in the EU or EEAEstablished in the UK. A separate entity.
NotificationCPNPSCPN. A separate submission.
Fragrance allergen listThe expanded 2023 listThe shorter pre-2023 list
Allergen thresholds0.001% leave-on, 0.01% rinse-offThe same
Harmonized classificationAnnex VIThe GB mandatory classification list
New hazard classes for endocrine disruptors and PBTAdoptedNot adopted
UFI and poison center notificationRequiredNo equivalent
Product file, and how long it is keptTen years after the last batchThe same

How Orris Bench handles this

Which markets a product is sold into is a fact you state once, per product, and it can be more than one. The documents that depend on it read it rather than assuming a market, so a product sold into the EU, Great Britain and the United States produces three sets of paperwork from one formula and one batch record, without the formula being entered three times.

Orris Bench keeps the GB notification record alongside the EU one, as the separate submissions they are, rather than treating one as a copy of the other. The safety data sheet is written to the profile of the market it is for, and the compliance work behind all of it, the IFRA assessment and the allergen figures, is done once on the formula and read by each market's documents.

Sources

The GB regime is the retained version of Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 as amended by UK statutory instruments, published on legislation.gov.uk. Notification is through the Office for Product Safety and Standards. The mandatory classification list and the GB substances of very high concern list are published free by the Health and Safety Executive under open government terms. The Northern Ireland position follows from the Windsor Framework. The EU figures are Regulation (EU) 2023/1545 and Regulation (EU) 2023/707. This page is written for people who make fragrances and it is not legal advice; check the current legislation.gov.uk and HSE texts before relying on any statement.

Common questions

Can my EU responsible person cover Great Britain?

No. A GB responsible person must be established in the United Kingdom, and an EU or EEA entity cannot serve as one. A business selling the same perfume into both markets needs two responsible persons and two addresses on two label versions. This is structural and there is no workaround for it.

Is Northern Ireland the same as Great Britain for cosmetics?

No. Great Britain means England, Scotland and Wales. Northern Ireland stays aligned with EU cosmetics rules under the Windsor Framework, so a product sold there follows the EU list and the EU portal. When a document says UK it is usually worth checking which of the two it means.

Which allergen list applies in Great Britain?

The shorter pre-2023 list that GB retained at the end of the transition period. Great Britain did not adopt Regulation (EU) 2023/1545, so the expanded EU list is not a GB requirement. Declaring more than GB asks for is not itself a breach, but the label still has to satisfy GB rules on language and legibility, so a single dual-market label is a decision to make deliberately rather than by accident.

All guides

Orris Bench does this work for you

Formulation and compliance in one application, on your own machine. It is not on sale yet. Ask to be told when it is, and nothing else.

If you write a question or a note, it is kept with your address so we can answer it, and it is deleted whenever your address is.

One message. Not a newsletter, and never passed to anybody else. The address is kept on this server, along with the date you gave it and the wording you agreed to, which is the record that you agreed. Ask and it is deleted outright.

See what it does